not a bad start. The rocket still needs work, the third fin behind it is all wrong. I don’t think the rocket will reproduce well at smaller sizes, it will lose some of its details. Reconsider the positioning of the company name also and size relative to the icon.
I agree with Matt, either the fin behind (right side) or the front fin needs to be altered – it depends on the perspective you’re going for.
I don’t think the “landing pad” is necessary it adds weight that throws off the balance of the logo (which is already struggling because of the positioning and size of the text like Matt already mentioned)
not a bad start. The rocket still needs work, the third fin behind it is all wrong. I don’t think the rocket will reproduce well at smaller sizes, it will lose some of its details. Reconsider the positioning of the company name also and size relative to the icon.
I agree with Matt, either the fin behind (right side) or the front fin needs to be altered – it depends on the perspective you’re going for.
I don’t think the “landing pad” is necessary it adds weight that throws off the balance of the logo (which is already struggling because of the positioning and size of the text like Matt already mentioned)